|
Post by Karen on Aug 21, 2021 12:36:30 GMT
OK, based on that response, kindly remove me from this forum. This is my last post. Oh, come ON, paul. Yes, everyone knows FD can sometimes be like that itch you can't scratch, but he takes flack too. Just the other day Karen came at him with guns blazing after evidently misreading one of his posts. (Little digs do have a way of accumulating, don't they?) Still, BB is like a playground compared to the old M*. Your posts are read and considered. Your contributions are appreciated. Isn't that enough? I, for one, would hate to lose you. PLEASE DO NOT attempt to speak for me (or, in effect, my husband), and especially DON'T make up excuses for me/us on my/our behalf. FWIW, I DID NOT misread his post. I read it literally and correctly based on his wording.
|
|
|
Post by richardsok on Aug 21, 2021 15:44:00 GMT
Oh, come ON, paul. Yes, everyone knows FD can sometimes be like that itch you can't scratch, but he takes flack too. Just the other day Karen came at him with guns blazing after evidently misreading one of his posts. (Little digs do have a way of accumulating, don't they?) Still, BB is like a playground compared to the old M*. Your posts are read and considered. Your contributions are appreciated. Isn't that enough? I, for one, would hate to lose you. PLEASE DO NOT attempt to speak for me (or, in effect, my husband), and especially DON'T make up excuses for me/us on my/our behalf. FWIW, I DID NOT misread his post. I read it literally and correctly based on his wording. Hi, Karen. Delighted to see that wasn't your last post after all.
|
|
|
Post by Karen on Aug 22, 2021 12:47:43 GMT
PLEASE DO NOT attempt to speak for me (or, in effect, my husband), and especially DON'T make up excuses for me/us on my/our behalf. FWIW, I DID NOT misread his post. I read it literally and correctly based on his wording. Hi, Karen. Delighted to see that wasn't your last post after all. richardsok"...(my) last post after all"? Not sure what you mean? It appears you are confusing me with poster paulr888 who recently stated he was going to stop posting here. Or maybe you know something about my status that I don't know? Please clarify.
|
|
|
Post by richardsok on Aug 22, 2021 16:03:32 GMT
Hi, Karen. Delighted to see that wasn't your last post after all. richardsok "...(my) last post after all"? Not sure what you mean? It appears you are confusing me with poster paulr888 who recently stated he was going to stop posting here. Or maybe you know something about my status that I don't know? Please clarify. Karen: evidently I did confuse you with the person(s) who announced their last post. My mistake. Peace.
|
|
galeno
Commander
KISS & STC
Posts: 221
|
Post by galeno on Aug 23, 2021 12:37:15 GMT
Back to the topic.
I vote for EM. They're relatively cheap. Also commodity heavy which may offer better protection against USD inflation vs TSM or TWSM equiities.
My second choice would be SC. Even better SCV.
|
|
|
Post by uncleharley on Aug 23, 2021 16:34:22 GMT
|
|
|
Post by FD1000 on Aug 23, 2021 23:50:04 GMT
galeno "I vote for EM. They're relatively cheap. Also commodity heavy" VWO is one of the biggest EM funds. Below is sector category. Can you please show its commodity heavy?Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by oldskeet on Aug 28, 2021 12:53:53 GMT
My three big movers within my own portfolio this past week (August 23 to 27) anitya,were two of my small/mid cap growth funds (FKASX +6.13% & AOFAX +5.75%) and the third was my commodity strategy fund (BCSAX +5.59%).
|
|
|
Post by richardsok on Sept 29, 2021 23:40:06 GMT
GOLDMAN SACHS SEES STRUCTURAL BULL MARKET IN ENERGY AHEAD.
HIGHLIGHTS:
Forecast crude rally continuing to $90bbl Global supply/demand deficit greater than formerly expected. Low hospitalization rates confirm COVID vax are effective; pointing to recovery & increased demand. Cyclical draws are largest on record and its scale will overwhelm OPEC willingness to ramp up production. A U.S. - Iran deal would be temporarily bearish.
|
|
|
Post by uncleharley on Sept 30, 2021 0:15:29 GMT
|
|